Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Screening Schedules This Week (05-31-06)


ROBINSONS MOVIEWORLD
X-MEN: The Last Stand
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM
Manay Po!
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM
All About Love
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM
Bandidas
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
The Benchwarmers
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
The Da Vinci Code
1:15 PM, 4:15, 7:15 PM


SM CITY CINEMA
The Benchwarmers
11:30 AM, 1:05 PM, 2:40, 4:15, 5:50, 7:25, 9 PM
All About Love
12 PM, 2:15, 4:30, 6:45, 9 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
11:40 AM, 2 PM, 4:20, 6:40, 9 PM
Manay Po!
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM
X-MEN: The Last Stand
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM
Bandidas
11:50 AM, 1:40 PM. 3:30, 5:20, 7:10, 9 PM

Thursday, May 25, 2006

X-MEN: THE LAST STAND


X-MEN: THE LAST STAND: An X-tremely Magnificent Instant Classic
by Reymundo Salao

This is the final installment to what is now known as the X-MEN Trilogy. Known as the “Children of the Atom” and the children of human evolution, MUTANTS have become widespread throughout the globe. But a "cure" for being a mutant was unveiled and this puts into motion the war between the radical mutants who seek to overthrow mankind which has shown mutant community the extent of human prejudice, and the X-men, a mutant group who would stand to defend humanity from mutants who would use their powers to threaten the rest of the defenseless human society.

When the comics series “X-men” was first conceived back in the 1960’s by Marvel comics’ father, living legend, Stan Lee (which makes an appearance in this film), it was to become one of the most profound comic book sagas, that which is way ahead of its time. Mutants have become a metaphor for the kinds of people who have become victims of prejudice, alienation, and fear. May it be because of race, culture, sex, appearance, religion, or even physical characteristics, whether that characteristic may be a deformity or not. Mutants are feared for what they can do, alienated for what they appear to be, and hated simply for what they are. Not only that; in the U.S., the term “Mutant” has been a slang term used to defame and demean those who are different and those who don’t fit in with the rest of society.


Right now, we live in a world wherein equality must prevail, even though factors like terrorist paranoia and biological threats continues to exist, there must be an undying movement for equality. With the cultural and technological advancements of the new millennium making the world smaller for us all, equality and tolerance must exist, because division and inequality might threaten to destroy us all.

One of this film's subplots involves a "cure" for being a mutant. In one way or another, the storyline subliminally raises the question; "Would you resort to change or alter yourself just to fit in to the rest of society, assuming that your uniqueness is never really a deformity or an abnormality?" Metaphorically, it could be like asking questions such as "If given a chance, would an Asian try to alter his looks just to look Caucasian or maybe less ethnic? If given a chance, would a homosexual alter his/her sexuality just for the sake of fitting in?" More or less, it could even make us think of our opinions on plastic surgery or playing god with the advances of technology? The film subliminally opens your mind up from the metaphors and to relevant social issues.


After the ending of the trilogy's second episode, entitled “X-2: X-Men United”, it is inevitable and understandable to those familiar with the X-men series that what will happen next is what is known as the "Phoenix saga" which is the storyline wherein Jean Grey is resurrected into the twisted character known as The Dark Phoenix. But it is quite obvious, from the trailers and the publicity of the film, that the main villain in the third installment of the trilogy still is Magneto, and that this third will obviously become the grand finale of Magneto's great war that he wishes to rage and has been talking about ever since the first film. And that the Dark Phoenix storyline is smartly blended along with the Magneto storyline, among other subplots yet to be revealed. But understandably, the film is designed to be a blockbuster big-explosion/big-stunts action bonanza, so understandably, the stunts, the actions, and the special effects would take the front seat in making this film a classic.

Looking back months ago, it was hard to imagine a director like Brett Ratner, whose credits include the mediocre "Red Dragon" and the popcorn flicks "Rush Hour" 1 & 2, to take on what was Bryan Singer's job of breathing life into what is the greatest superhero team saga in comics’ history. Thankfully, for all of us, this third X-men movie stays true to the mood, tone, and overall continuity and consistency with the first two films. With the last X-men movie etching itself to be one of the best superhero movies of all time, this sequel never lets down to shine much more and manages to rise into a new level of cinematic high.


Patrick Stewart, Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry, Ian McKellen, Famke Janssen, and all the other X-men characters from the first two movies reprise their roles with an excellent continuity. The new players in the X-world are Vinnie Jones (Snatch, Mean Machine) as the unstoppable Juggernaut, the lovely young Ellen Page as Kitty "Shadowcat" Pryde, Ben Foster in an unexpectedly smaller-than-expected role as Warren "Angel" Worthington III, and Kelsey Grammar in a charming role as Dr. Henry "Hank" McCoy, the blue-furred "Beast". The casting of characters may be numerous, but it does not fail to become confusing, and succeeds in being done orderly.

However, in one way or another, the film may tend to rely on the idea that the viewer has either watched the two other X-men films, and/or is also familiar with the entire X-men mythos; From the characters, to their powers, to their capabilities and convictions. Not unless you are familiar with such information, you should open your ears and hear out each and every important detail of the storyline.

The film's superpower action is very inventive, never redundant and is way ahead of falling off the cliché hook. Its script and storyline stretches itself far from being predictable. You may consider yourself familiar with the numerous popular X-men storylines, but even that will still less likely exempt you from the film's jaw-dropping surprises; moments in this film which, I'm sure that you will agree with me when I say, that it happens more than once. In addition, I would advice for you not to leave the theater after the end credits because there is a bonus extra scene. A perfectly satisfying epilogue for this final chapter.

X-MEN: The Last Stand is this summer's juggernaut blockbuster sci-fi-action-adventure megamovie! A never miss! It is a comic nerd's wet-dream come true! A definite superhero saga movie to end all superhero sagas. Up to this date, the Holy Grail of superhero team movies; An X-traordinarily Superior X-perience! X-citingly X-terminating all X-pectations! This is X-MEN: THE LAST STAND

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Screening Schedules This Week (05-24-06)


ROBINSONS MOVIEWORLD
X-MEN: The Last Stand
11:45 AM, 2:15 PM, 4:45, 7:15 PM
Aquamarine
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Over the Hedge
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
X-MEN: The Last Stand
11:15 AM, 1:45 PM, 4:15, 6:45 PM
Submerged
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
The Da Vinci Code
10:30 AM, 1:25 PM, 4:20, 7:15 PM

SM CITY CINEMA
Over the Hedge
11:30 AM, 1:05 PM, 2:40, 4:15, 5:50, 7:25, 9 PM
X-MEN: The Last Stand
11:45 AM, 1:45 PM, 3:45, 5:45, 7:45 PM
X-MEN: The Last Stand
12:15 PM, 2:15, 4:15, 6:15, 8:15 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
11:40 AM, 2 PM, 4:20, 6:40, 9 PM
Poseidon
11:50 AM, 1:40 PM. 3:30, 5:20, 7:10, 9 PM
X-MEN: The Last Stand
11 AM, 1 PM, 3, 5, 7, 9 PM
Aquamarine
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM

Friday, May 19, 2006


THE DA VINCI CODE: Excitingly Thought-Provoking
By Reymundo Salao

When symbologist Professor Robert Langdon was summoned to investigate a murder in the Louvre along with police cryptologist Sophie Neveu aiding him, the clues lead to a shocking conspiracy that would shake the very foundations of the Catholic Church.

THE DA VINCI CODE is the film adaptation of the controversial novel by Dan Brown which has caused quite a controversy of a massive worldwide scale, particularly, in the Christian community, resulting in the uprising of abhorrence towards the film, calling for a ban on it, and in fact resulted to the standing ban for the showing of the film in the city of Manila's (not the entirety of Metro Manila) movie theaters. Why are they against the film that much? It is because the film presents the idea that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene. Whether this revelation is fact as backed up by concrete evidence is highly debatable. What is indeed thought provoking is the compelling information it presents.

But inasmuch as the controversy and the hype that surrounds this movie is due to its supposed "scandallous" revelations, I have found that the storyline isn’t at all offensive to Christianism. As far as matters of opinion and points-of-view are concerned, the movie is not one-sided and spotlights both opinions with a well-balanced presentation of the dual interpretations of the "evidences" presented. There is still that respect for both sides of opinion. Ultimately, it leaves the viewers with a free-thinking choice of digesting it either as informative fact, or a thrilling story of fiction.


I wouldn’t have thought that I would be as thrilled watching this movie as expected. This film is directed by Ron Howard, who's known for his directorial work in films like Cinderella Man and A Beautiful Mind. Howard is one of those directors whom I treat as one of the forgettable reputed directors. His style has always been clean, but plain. Regardless of that plain factor that sometimes has a danger of stepping into mediocrity, his work on The Da Vinci Code succeeds in indeed keeping the film up to its thrilling, thought-provoking pace. The film smartly avoids dull moments and tends to get exciting as each step is taken. From the flashback scenes, to the mood setting, the film is well-executed. The film boasts a top-notch cast of reputed performers. Tom Hanks impressively played Robert Langdon as the believable hero that he is. The enchantingly beautiful Audrey Tautou as Sophie Neveu was marvelous in her role. Ian McKellen was adorable as the cunning Sir Leigh Teabing, and Alfred Molina is fitting as the shadowy Bishop Aringosa, same with Jean Reno as the determined Bezu Fache. It is said that when Dan Brown wrote the character of Bezu with Jean Reno in mind. But it is Paul Bettany as the Opus Dei assassin Silas who strikes as the character that draws much attention from the audience. His portrayal of an assassin who is considered by his allies as God's soldier is menacingly cool. His very lethal facial expression alone gives an unsettling effect, the kind that reminds me of Darth Maul.

I really don’t know what the big deal is with all the oppositions against this movie/book, but its story never shook my faith as a Christian one bit.

The problem is not with the movie, but with the movie-going audience who may confuse fact with fiction. In our cultural history, movies have become very influential in terms of perception of truth. Movies may influence public opinion, particularly, if it is a movie that has gained popularity. And where did The Da Vinci Code gain its popularity? Ironically, from those who seek to ban it. This movie has become so sensationalized by its opponents, to the point that their fuss has created a wide interest and curiosity for the film. Even among friends and co-workers who rarely watch movies, have been seduced by the curiosity to watch the film.

Whether the issues discussed in The Da Vinci Code may be factual or not should be a separate issue with how good the movie is. Fact or not, it is still a movie, based on a book of fiction. And it is a great thrilling tale of fiction. Perhaps those who are against this movie are afraid of having to delve into the ideas and ask the questions about what may lie in history, about which story would be truth? I enjoyed the film; I have found the issues it presents are discussion-worthy and indeed thought-provoking. The film does not offend me because I am confidently secure with my faith as a Christian.

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Screening Schedules This Week (05-18-06)


ROBINSONS MOVIEWORLD
The Da Vinci Code
10:30 AM, 1:25 PM, 4:20, 7:15 PM
Poseidon
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
12 PM, 2:55, 4:50, 7:15 PM
The Da Vinci Code
12:55 PM, 3:50, 6:45 PM
American Soldiers
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
The Sentinel (2006)
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM

SM CITY CINEMA
Aquamarine
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM
The Da Vinci Code

Mission: Impossible 3
11:40 AM, 2 PM, 4:20, 6:40, 9 PM
American Soldiers
11:50 AM, 1:40 PM. 3:30, 5:20, 7:10, 9 PM
Poseidon
11:50 AM, 1:40 PM. 3:30, 5:20, 7:10, 9 PM
Submerged
12:15 PM, 2 PM, 3:45, 5:30, 7:15, 9 PM
The Da Vinci Code

Friday, May 12, 2006

Poseidon (2006)


POSEIDON: THRILLING BUT NOT UNFORGETTABLE
by Reymundo Salao

A massive cruise ship in high seas is struck by a freak tidal wave which sends the ship to tumble upside down. And as the ship continues to sink and is gradually being destroyed, a number of survivors decide to struggle their way through complicated labyrinth-like passageways in order to survive and find a way to get off the ship.

POSEIDON is the remake of the 1972 classic POSEIDON ADVENTURE. I usually find disaster movies boring. I also thought that this remake was needless, considering how good the original version was. And Wolfgang Petersen's last big movie "Troy" failed miserably to amuse me. But thank God for the money and the time that I spent for this movie, I was wrong. Wolfgang Petersen's POSEIDON is teeth-gritting big bag of explosive and massively destructive suspense. Like most disaster movies, POSEIDON carries with it a depressing factor. Understandably, the kind of carnage involved in a disaster movie is totally different from the kind of carnage we see in films like Godzilla, for example. But the degree of drama and dangerous tension is radiant in this film that you actually feel the characters' sense of futility and their relentless effort to survive.

Sure, Wolfgang Petersen may already be master of sea tragedies, having helmed films like DAS BOOT and THE PERFECT STORM. This film is definitely an addition to his line-up of sea-travel thrillers. And indeed, he delivers the thrill and the fear of sea-disasters, perhaps to a point that I may say that this is the kind of movie that may give people a phobia for sea-travel.

the movie does not dilly dally on needless introductory drama, its characters are simple enough that it needs not delve into the layers to understand who or what each character is. the story goes headlong into the disaster itself and into the horrendous experience that the characters go through. As the story progresses, only then do we get a deeper understanding of who each character is. The action sequences that involve an obstacle to survive or to escape from are breath-gripping suspenseful. There were moments when you would hold your breath along with the characters of this movie.

Josh Lucas plays an excellent leading man/hero. My guess is that this movie may pave the way for him to be the new regular action-adventure hero actor for more blockbusters to come. Richard Dreyfuss may have had a long standing reputation in cinema, having worked in many great films, but on this film, he humbles by playing a smaller slice of the lead role compared to many of his works. Kurt Russell, Emma Rossum, Mike Vogel, Jacinda Barrett and Jimmy Bennett's performances were fine on the average level only as far as the storyline permits them. But catching my eye is the performance of a fresh face, Mia Maestro who plays Elena, who delivers a splendid performance as a woman who rode this ship in order to travel to New York and visit her brother who was admitted in a New York hospital.

The only problem with POSEIDON is its simplicity and the cliché brand that it obviously carries with it. The original POSEIDON ADVENTURE was phenomenal during its time that movies of the same theme copied its style endlessly, so much so that it has become a standard cliché. One which this remake is branded with. From sequence progression, to pacing, to character variation, these movies seem to have a ready-made template for the film-makers to fill. In a malicious-thinking point of view, the "homage to the original movie" seemed to be an excuse to execute the clichés. But dissection of the movie aside, the film does connect with the audience in terms of drama, tension, and thrills, whether it is a cliché or not. Thankfully, the execution of the storyline lets you forget this flaw. After all, films are made to be enjoyed, and not be dissected.

Slither


SLITHER: IT’S CREEPY! IT’S FUN! IT’S THE PERFECT BARKADA MOVIE!
By Reymundo Salao

The sleepy town of Wheelsy could be any small town in America – somewhat quaint and gentle, more like our rural towns here in our country, peopled with friendly folks who mind their own business. But just beneath the surface charm, something unnamed and evil has arrived…and is growing. No one seems to notice as telephone poles become clogged with missing pet flyers, or when one of the town's richest citizens, Grant Grant (Michael Rooker), begins to act strangely. But when farmers' livestock turn up horribly mutilated and a young women goes missing, Sheriff Bill Pardy (Nathan Fillion) and his team, aided by Grant's wife Starla (Elizabeth Banks), uncover the dark force laying siege to their town… and come face-to-face with an older-than-time organism intent on absorbing and devouring all life on Earth.


This movie is reminiscent of the B-movie horror classics of the 1980's and 90's like "Critters" and "Ghoulies". And it is intentionally made as an homage to the quirkiness and the bizarreness of these classics. And in addition to that is the creepy humor that goes along with it. This movie may make you puke in horror, but I'm sure it will also make you laugh with many of its bizzaro hilarious scenes.

SLITHER is directed by screenwriter James Gunn, who wrote the re-envisioning of the classic Dawn of the Dead. As his directorial debut, Gunn delivers the good excellently, having a deep and full understanding of the B-movie horror genre, Gunn recreates the spirit of 1980's horror, from the cheesy dialogues, to the quirky music, to the outrageous humor, to the gross creatures of evil. Gunn delivers an A-1 "comedy-gore".

The film stars Nathan Fillion (who was last seen in the sleeper smash sci-fi hit, which was sadly unreleased locally "SERENITY". he is also rumored to be the next Indiana Jones) as the hero Bill Pardy, Elizabeth Banks as Starla Grant, and Michael Rooker as Grant Grant (first name and last name, funny eh?), who is the host-monster in this movie, who plays it really well as a strange quirky "monster-in-human-form" guy.

This is one horror movie that may be gory, but fun. It has no seriously disturbing, mind-etching, nightmare-inducing horror. Rather, it just has a giggle-roaring, EEEWWW-screaming, thrill-ride of nasty b-movie gore. There is really nothing much to say about SLITHER except that you should not underestimate it. It is already a definite sleeper (unexpected, smalltime movies that explode big in the box-office and critical consensus) summer hit in the US. SLITHER is a sure-fun barkada movie. Well, just don’t eat a lot inside the movie while watching it. Hehehe!

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Screening Schedules This Week (05-10-06)


ROBINSONS MOVIEWORLD
Poseidon
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Slither
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Silent Hill
1:55 PM, 4:35, 7:15
Mission: Impossible 3
12 PM, 2:55, 4:50, 7:15 PM
Apoy sa Dibdib ng Samar
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Last Holiday
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM

SM CITY CINEMA
D' Lucky Ones!
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM
Poseidon
11 AM, 1PM, 3, 5, 7, 9 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
11:40 AM, 2 PM, 4:20, 6:40, 9 PM
Poseidon
12 PM, 2, 4, 6, 8 PM
Silent Hill
11:40 AM, 2 PM, 4:20, 6:40, 9 PM
Apoy sa Dibdib ng Samar
11:50 AM, 1:40 PM. 3:30, 5:20, 7:10, 9 PM

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Mission: Impossible 3


MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE 3: NOT QUITE IMPOSSIBLE, BUT VERY UNORIGINAL
By Reymundo Salao

IMF (Impossible Missions Force) Secret Agent Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) more or less considers himself retired from active duty the day he committed to a serious relationship with Julia, the woman he truly loves. But he is drawn to a mission that involves the kidnapping of an operative which is not only a dear friend to him but is also Ethan's pupil. As this mission becomes too complicated that it becomes a personal vendetta for Ethan, he meets Owen Davian, a vicious blackmarket lord whose power and influence makes him impregnable to be caught by the many of the world's intelligence agencies. Davian eventually finds out Ethan Hunt's weak spot, which is the woman he loves. And uses her to make Ethan do his bidding.

The storyline dwells outside the typical "mission" storyline and gives us a spotlight on what happens if a secret agent's personal security is compromised when his enemies get to the agent's family or loved ones. Mission: Impossible 3 just has a storyline that may rival the finest Steven Seagal movie. With a storyline that has been overdone in Hollywood movies and executed without a shred of originality, this movie is just good if you’re in the mood for eye candy action. A dumbed-down spy movie with a silly plotline but entertaining action. This movie just looks like Cruise's own version of James Bond. On the other hand, MI2 and MI3 may not have been awful as James Bond movies.

Although that I'm sure that this movie will indeed satisfy those who crave for hot spy action, and will indeed draw up mass numbers in the box office, I really would not share the same excitement that favors this movie. But what many would find unusually startling is that there are a number of us who dislike these Mission: Impossible movies because these movies have been committing grave acts of sacrilege upon what is already considered a respected Espionage-thriller series. Let me give you a comparison. What if Harry Potter was filmed in "Bagets-style" teen flick format complete with a pa-tweetums lovestory not found in the books, but just improvised just to draw up numbers in the box-office? What if the Da Vinci Code was made into a Jerry Bruckheimer-produced action flick starring Ben Affleck with explosive action sequences not found in the book, but improvised to make it more explosive action appealing"? Wouldn’t that draw up a bad reaction from the fans of the source material? It is the same case with Mission: Impossible, a TV series about a secret agent team which goes into impossible espionage missions, yet they fulfill it unscathed by detection, so much so that by the end of the episode when the bad guys are defeated, they have no idea that they were duped by manipulative spies of the Impossible Missions Force. Whilst in the movie, the main character leaves a trail of explosions. This is a clear example of Hollywood ruining the classics; forever tarnishing the good name for which such stood for (same with Planet of the Apes and how Tim Burton's remake ruined it)


The script is written by Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, and director JJ Abrams. JJ Abram's directing is well-executed. But I'm sure he can build up a better reputation with another project worth his talent. On the other hand, Abrams is already enjoying a phenomenal reputation having created the hit TV series' "Alias", "Lost" and "Felicity".

Just like MI2, there is an unusual sense of narcissistic spotlight that surrounds actor-producer Tom Cruise's character. It was as if the entire script was written around him. They should’ve entitled MI2 and this movie "The Ethan Hunt Adventures". He's the producer who pays for the entire movie anyway. The characters of Ving Rhames, Billy Crudup, and the lusciously alluring Maggie Q all take a back seat as script wallflowers playing off the main character. There was even a one minute spotlight on Maggie Q's character which was awkwardly not followed-up by the progression of the storyline. Tom Cruise is not a bad actor. It was refreshing to see Cruise as a villain in Collateral. But for him to go back and do the same old protagonistic action hero role, in which he has done for almost 10 years has taken its toll. Not unless it is a movie with an exceptionally good storyline. But with a mediocre storyline and a role that we have already seen in many guises and in many Cruise interpretations, he really could not expect praise for his monotonous role in this movie. Philip Seymour Hoffman, is another story, though. Because Hoffman has delivered a truly-salute-deserving diabolical villain performance in this movie. Being the redeeming factor of the film, Hoffman has created this kind of fan-inducing villain, which may remind us of the charisma of Star War's Darth Vader.


Sure it's flashy, loud, and explosive. But aside from that, it is nothing special from your average mediocre big summer action flick. Sadly, the thrills, intrigue, and storyline are a pale comparison to one of the episodes of the Mission: Impossible TV series. The good news is that this movie is clearly a notch above amusing. And indeed it is a movie made for the mass crowds who like their popcorn action with a whole lot of explosions, gunfight, and cheesy stunts.

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Screening Schedules This Week (05-03-06)


ROBINSONS MOVIEWORLD
Mission: Impossible 3
12 PM, 2:25, 4:50, 7:15 PM
The Wild
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Silent Hill
1:55 PM, 4:35, 7:15
Mission: Impossible 3
1:55 PM, 4:20, 6:45 PM
Grandma's Boy
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Tiger Blade
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM

SM CITY CINEMA
D' Lucky Ones!
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
10:50 AM, 1:15 PM, 3:40, 6:05, 8:30 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
11:20 AM, 1:45 PM, 4:10, 6:35, 9 PM
The Wild
11:30 AM, 1:05 PM, 2:40, 4:15, 5:50, 7:25, 9 PM
Mission: Impossible 3
12:15 PM, 2:40 PM, 5:05, 7:30 PM
Silent Hill
11:40 AM, 2 PM, 4:20, 6:40, 9 PM
A Chinese Tall Story
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM