Thursday, March 08, 2007

Frank Miller's 300


THE GLORIOUS IMMORTALITY OF THE 300
By Reymundo Salao

300 is a film adaptation of Frank Miller's graphic novel of the same title which recounts and immortalizes one of the greatest battles in history, the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C., in which 300 Spartans, led by its King Leonidas fought against invading Persian King Xerxes and his massive army of one million soldiers.

300’s epic tale has already been renowned, but Frank Miller intended the graphic novel to make this moment history greater, more immortal, and indeed the film does the same as it brings to life the world of how Frank Miller honors the valiance of the Spartans. Grounded on realism, tweaked by a sense of drama and modern action-film sensibilities, and faithful to Miller's ideas. The movie may not necessarily be historically accurate, but definitely faithful to the graphic novel. Miller was first inspired by the Spartans when he saw the film “300 Spartans” as a kid. By the time he gained his royal status in the comicbook industry by revolutionizing and rewriting the reputation of such characters like Batman, Daredevil, and Wolverine with such a mature and dark approach, he went on to do his research on the Spartans, even traveling to Greece itself to recreate the battle that boasted the reputation of the Spartans. Fast forward to the present, he is the executive producer who is now taking the recounts of history and creating an immortal mythology out of it.


The movie has a distinct cinematographic look and feel that takes you into the world of Frank Miller's 300. Everything has an accurate resemblance to the graphic novel, even done more artfully, as if the pages of the graphic novel itself translated into life reality. There are scenes that look like masterful paintings on canvass come to life. So much so that one can only embrace its full-blown beauty when one watches it in the movie theaters (It would certainly be a waste to watch it on a blurry pirated copy). The world of the 300 movie does not try to take you to an actual academically accurate take on this historical battle, no, it takes you into Miller's version of the Battle instead.

The director Zack Snyder employs basically a familiar style to how Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino approached the adaptation of Frank Miller's other creation, "SIN CITY" which is an outright direct interpretation of the source material, right up from the pages of the comic book and unto film, and we're talking scene-by-scene, color-by-color, tone-by-tone, dialogue-by-dialogue. But Snyder enhances the adaptation by adding relevant details that spice up the movie, from fighting sequence details, to additional villains, to complexities and depth of the storyline. Snyder also co-wrote the screenplay of this movie along with Kurt Johnstad, a screenplay that made the story more meaningful and more poetic. The narrative prose the movie has makes it more classic and timeless.


Zack Snyder may not have pioneered a unique style in this movie. He cannot claim his name on pioneering the visual "cinematographic comic book art-on-film" aspect of it and the employment of slow-motion and fast-motion action scenes, but he certainly uses all these styles with his own disciplined and flawlessly masterful use of such styles.

Gerard Butler's performance as Leonidas was suitable for a man who has the gutsy, unnatural courage, yet true to the virtues of love for country and for freedom. The impact of his powerful acting was suitable to portray such a heroic warrior-king. David Wenham, who's gained popularity as Faramir from Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy, played the role of Dilios, a Spartan warrior and poet by heart, who was also the narrator of this tale. His narration provided a vehicle for such rich prose that this storyline has. Lena Headey's portrayal of Queen Gorgo clearly mirrored Leonidas' courage. While Leonidas fights on the battlefield, Gorgo fights on the arena of politics, a subplot not included in the original graphic novel.


Purists would sometimes complain and argue how comic/graphic novel film adaptations can be so mellowed-down for a generally "pop" crowd, and would tend to deviate from the source material just to conform to popular standards of non-violence and a relatively general patronage. This adaptation of Frank Miller's "300" was not only faithful; it was intensified with a deeper sense of maturity and darkness. It never shied away from the graphic violence of the comics; it even gave the violence gorier detail, making it closer to x-rated violence. Like many war epics, this one is indeed bloody violent. But because of its distinct cinematography, it sometimes blurs the violence into something surreal. Keen observers may, for instance, take note that many of the blood splatter scenes looks as if intentionally looked less realistic and more closer to how the blood splatters in the artworks of the graphic novel from which this movie is based on. This movie is more daring, and that's even an understatement, as it gives a darker storyline in terms of the ones that involve the character of Queen Gorgo, Leonidas' wife. Recaffeinated, a vivid espresso version of the original, this film adaptation is Madness (in a good way), but as the line from the movie goes. "Madness? ...This IS SPARTA!"

There is no conservative inhibitive filtering of the sexual content either, yet it was done in a tasteful artful manner, without the hint of a sense of pornographic malice. There are minor scenes of nudity and sexual content that isn’t in the source material to begin with, but it felt right to include those scenes in a full feature-length film adaptation.

300 has this Nietzsche-ish ubermensch atmosphere, similar to watching movies like “Conan the Barbarian” and “Rambo”. Heroes fearlessly facing insurmountable odds and laughing at it with a confidence that could sometimes be a kind of arrogance, because one is fighting for what is good and honorable. A war epic with a boombastic inspirational strength and bound to be an immortal classic, 300 is looking to become the year’s biggest motion picture event.


The man himself, Frank Miller, on the set of 300

Friday, March 02, 2007

Apocalypto


Mel Gibson's APOCALYPTO
By Reymundo Salao

Set in the Yucatán Peninsula (Mexico) before Spanish contact, APOCALYPTO depicts one man's experience during the decline of the ancient Mayan civilization. The story begins when a Yucatan tribe is nightmarishly ravaged by merciless warriors. After the scourge, its people are taken prisoner, and into the Mayan city, they are taken. For what reason? They would soon find out. In a radical twist of fortune, one of the tribesmen named Jaguar Paw escapes captivity and runs for his life into the woods, with bloodthirsty Mayan warriors on his tail.

The film is co-written (the other one is Farhad Safinia) and directed by Mel Gibson. if you are familiar with the directorial works (and even the ones where he was just an actor) of Mel Gibson, you could see some detail trademarks that are familiar. One such detail is the scene where a villain slits the throat of a helpless important character. Such a scene can be seen in Gibson's Braveheart. A similar style of sadistic killing of a character close to the protagonist can be observed in Gibson’s movies where he starred in. Gibson seems to always have a secondary main villain who is designed so that the audiences will really hate him. This is similar to Braveheart and also something he probably picked up from his Mad Max movies. Apocalypto has many elements that connect love, loss, and vindication, all elements he used in a similar manner in Braveheart. His use of scenes of sheer harmony and peace to be disturbed by a stark contrast of violence, as a tool for strong drama, similarly (also) in Braveheart and Passion of the Christ can be noticed.


The scoring, cinematography, and set design magnificently complement each other. It can be noticed that this film was shot in high definition, the colors are vivid, and the motions are lifelike. Each fragment of film can effectively tell of its haunting theme.

This film is very violent and bloody. Audiences must be wary of the adult content of this movie. The scenes of gore are, at many times, graphic. Same can be said about the tone of the climactic parts of the movie, grim and heavy on emotion. It should be noted that the dialogue for this movie is in the Yucatan dialect, as it aims for authenticity in production.


While Apocalypto may be a perfect educational tool for anthropology class, it works great as an action thriller. I thought the movie would be somewhat of a "national geographic" kind of treatment that there would be a danger of it being boring. But I was wrong, Mel Gibson let's us see a portion of Mayan history filled with gripping suspense, thrill and sheer horror. It also contains interesting dialogues including one which has a very environmental tone, and philosophical as well. The movie is partially intended as a political allegory about civilizations in decline. Said Gibson in September of 2006: "The precursors to a civilization that’s going under are the same, time and time again... "This is shown most literally though the opening quote by Will Durant and the last line by one character,"...seek a new beginning.


I was glad that this movie is in extended run. Viscerally rich with all aspects of emotion from beauty to utter fear, APOCALYPTO is a movie so stimulating it continuously interests you till the end.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

The Good Shepherd


THE GOOD SHEPHERD: The Grim Dark Side of Espionage
by Reymundo Salao

Coming from a distinguished family, Edward Wilson began as a member of the Skull and Bones Society at Yale, where future world leaders converge. Brilliant and secretive, his scruples land him at the Office of Strategic Services, the CIA's precursor, and actually helps found the Central Intelligence Agency. But his idealism gradually gives way to suspicion, borne by Cold War paranoia. While he becomes a veteran agent, his lack of trust on everyone grows and grows, even as he is willing to put everything on the line--even his family life--for an all-consuming job. Loosely based on real events, it is advertised as telling the untold story of the birth of counter-intelligence in the Central Intelligence Agency.

This espionage drama is directed by legendary actor Robert De Niro (which marks his third directorial work after “A Bronx Tale” and “The Score”) and boasts a surprisingly stellar cast that includes Matt Damon, Angelina Jolie, William Hurt, Alec Baldwin, John Turturro, and appearances by Joe Pesci, Michael Gambon, Timothy Hutton, Billy Crudup, and Robert De Niro. THE GOOD SHEPHERD enjoys much praise from critics but because of an apparent lack of marketing, it seems to have failed to create a hype that will draw the attention of audiences.

THE GOOD SHEPHERD is more of espionage drama than action. This is as realistic as it gets. And the spywork here is not your usual cloak & dagger thriller where spies run after each other exchanging silencer-filtered salvos of gunfire. In its place is a very solid human drama of people involved in such an inhuman business of intelligence and counter-intelligence. With that, this movie has been known as the “Godfather” of spy-movies.

As respectable as his acting career, De Niro delivers a remarkable product with this movie which he has directed. This movie proves that De Niro also has a stark talent in directing that is never mediocre or standardized. The flow and consistency of the storyline is smooth, and he also knows how to budget his scenes that involve long timelines. There are numerous scenes that are beautifully edited in order to establish an almost unnoticeable jump of time skips from one scene to another. In other words, a story that could have taken more than three or four hours to tell has been smartly edited to fit in 2 hours and 47 seconds.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The 2007 ACADEMY AWARDS


Best motion picture of the year
Babel
Letters from Iwo Jima
Little Miss Sunshine
The Queen
THE WINNER: The Departed

Performance by an actor in a leading role
Leonardo DiCaprio, Blood Diamond
Ryan Gosling, Half Nelson
Peter O’Toole, Venus
Will Smith, The Pursuit of Happyness
THE WINNER: Forest Whitaker, The Last King of Scotland

Performance by an actor in a supporting role
Jackie Earle Haley, Little Children
Djimon Hounsou, Blood Diamond
Eddie Murphy, Dreamgirls
Mark Wahlberg, The Departed
THE WINNER: Alan Arkin, Little Miss Sunshine

Original screenplay
Guillermo Arriaga, Babel
Iris Yamashita, Paul Haggis, Letters from Iwo Jima
Guillermo del Toro, Pan's Labyrinth
Peter Morgan, The Queen
THE WINNER: Michael Arndt, Little Miss Sunshine

Achievement in cinematography
The Black Dahlia
Children of Men
The Illusionist
The Prestige
THE WINNER: Pan’s Labyrinth

Visual Effects
Poseidon
Superman Returns
THE WINNER: Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest

Achievement in costume design
Curse of the Golden Flower
The Devil Wears Prada
Dreamgirls
The Queen
THE WINNER: Marie Antoinette

Achievement in sound mixing
Apocalypto
Blood Diamond
Flags of our Fathers
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
THE WINNER: Dreamgirls

Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)
"Listen," Dreamgirls
"Love You I Do," Dreamgirls
"Our Town," Cars
"Patience," Dreamgirls
THE WINNER: "I Need to Wake Up," An Inconvenient Truth

Best animated feature film of the year
Cars
Monster House
THE WINNER: Happy Feet

Best documentary feature
Deliver Us from Evil
Iraq in Fragments
Jesus Camp
My Country, My Country
THE WINNER: An Inconvenient Truth

Best animated short film
Lifted
The Little Matchgirl
Maestro
No Time for Nuts
THE WINNER: The Danish Poet

Achievement in directing
Babel, Alejandro González Iñárritu
Letters from Iwo Jima, Clint Eastwood
The Queen, Stephen Frears
United 93, Paul Greengrass
THE WINNER: The Departed, Martin Scorsese

Performance by an actress in a leading role
Penélope Cruz, Volver
Judi Dench, Notes on a Scandal
Meryl Streep, The Devil Wears Prada
Kate Winslet, Little Children
THE WINNER: Helen Mirren, The Queen

Performance by an actress in a supporting role
Adriana Barraza, Babel
Cate Blanchett, Notes on a Scandal
Abigail Breslin, Little Miss Sunshine
Rinko Kikuchi, Babel
THE WINNER: Jennifer Hudson, Dreamgirls

Adapted screenplay
Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
Children of Men
Little Children
Notes on a Scandal
THE WINNER: The Departed

Achievement in film editing
Babel
Blood Diamond
Children of Men
United 93
THE WINNER: The Departed

Achievement in art direction
Dreamgirls
The Good Shepherd
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
The Prestige
THE WINNER: Pan's Labyrinth

Achievement in makeup
Apocalypto
Click
THE WINNER: Pan's Labyrinth

Achievement in sound editing
Apocalypto
Blood Diamond
Flags of Our Fathers
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
THE WINNER: Letters from Iwo Jima

Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)
The Good German
Notes on a Scandal
Pan's Labyrinth
The Queen
THE WINNER: Babel

Best foreign language film of the year
After the Wedding
Days of Glory (Indigènes)
Pan's Labyrinth
Water
THE WINNER: The Lives of Others

Best documentary short subject
Recycled Life
Rehearsing a Dream
Two Hands
THE WINNER: The Blood of Yingzhou District

Best live action short film
Binta and the Great Idea (Binta Y La Gran Idea)
Éramos Pocos (One Too Many)
Helmer & Son
The Saviour
THE WINNER: West Bank Story

The 27th Annual Golden Raspberry Awards (The Razzies)


Along with the Academy Awards that honor the BEST in film, the GOLDEN RASPBERRY Awards honors THE WORST in film.

Worst Picture:
Basic Instinct 2
a.k.a.
Basically, It Stinks, Too
Sony/Columbia

Worst Actress:
Sharon Stone
Basically, It Stinks, Too

Worst Actor:
Marlon Wayans & Shawn Wayans
Little Man

Worst Supporting Actress:
Carmen Electra
Date Movie and Scary Movie 4

Worst Supporting Actor:
M. Night Shyamalan
Lady in the Water

Worst Director:
M. Night Shyamalan
Lady in the Water

Worst Screen Couple:
Shawn Wayans
& either
Kerry Washington
or
Marlon Wayans

Little Man

Worst Remake Or Rip-off:
Little Man
(Rip-off of the 1954 Bugs Bunny cartoon "Baby Buggy Bunny")

Worst Prequel or Sequel:
Basically, It Stinks, Too

Worst Screenplay:
Basically, It Stinks, Too
Screenplay by Leora Barish & Henry Bean, Based on Characters Created by Joe Ezsterhas

Worst Excuse for Family Entertainment:
(New Category, Saluting the Celebs We're ALL Sick & Tired Of!)
RV
(Sony/Columbia)

Awards Per Picture:

Basically, It Stinks, Too — 4 "Wins":
Worst Picture, Worst Actress, Worst Sequel, Worst Screenplay


Little Man — 3 "Wins":
Worst Actor, Worst Screen Couple and Worst Remake/Rip-Off


Lady in the Water — 2 "Wins":
Worst Supporting Actor and Worst Director

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Screening Schedule this Week (02-21-07)


SM CITY CINEMA
Babel
11 AM, 1:30 PM, 4, 6:30, 9 PM
Arthur & the Invisibles
11:25 AM, 1:20 PM, 3:15, 5:10, 7:05, 9 PM
The Promise
10:35 AM, 12:40 PM, 2:45, 4:50, 6:55, 9 PM
GHOST RIDER
10:35 AM, 12:40 PM, 2:45, 4:50, 6:55, 9 PM
The Curse of the Golden Flower
10:35 AM, 12:40 PM, 2:45, 4:50, 6:55, 9 PM
The Messengers
11 AM, 12:40 PM, 2:20, 4, 5:40, 7:20, 9 PM

ROBINSONS MOVIEWORLD
GHOST RIDER
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM
The Promise
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM
Catch & Release
12:45 PM, 2:55, 5:05, 7:15 PM
Apocalypto
11:15 AM, 1:55 PM, 4:35, 7:15
The Messengers
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM
Arthur & the Invisibles
1:15 PM, 3:15, 5:15, 7:15 PM

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Ghost Rider


GHOST RIDER: BETTER LOWER THOSE EXPECTATIONS, IT’S DISAPPOINTING
by Reymundo Salao

Johnny Blaze made a deal with a devil named Mephistopheles in order to cure his dying father. But that deal cost him his soul. And now, he has become the devil's bounty hunter. At night, in the presence of evil, Johnny Blaze transforms into the hellish being known as The Ghost Rider, and his first major bounty is to destroy the demon known as Blackheart and his minions.

GHOST RIDER is an adaptation of the Marvel comics series of the same title. Since I grew up with comic books, I am a big fan of comic book movies. And of course, I was excited to see the GHOST RIDER movie adaptation. Sure, I lowered down my expectations because the storyline of "Ghost Rider" has been used and overused in numerous films with vaguely similar storylines. I expected for it to be a movie loved with the highest tolerance to criticism. But a disappointing film is a disappointing film. And if it has too little redeeming factors, then there's no reason not to talk about it.


Don’t get me wrong, GHOST RIDER would not necessarily make you feel like you’re throwing away your money on crap. GHOST RIDER has its moments of utter coolness. The fiery transformations with gothic angelic chorals on the background, the bits of humor, that hellishly radical bike he rides. I would not have even cared if the storyline would be considered over-used & cliché, because I already did expect that. But just the overall delivery of the movie itself was purely bland. The movie was fun but disappointing.

It's no surprise, this film was directed by Mark Steven Johnson, the same guy who directed the Daredevil movie, which also could be considered a failure. well, I guess that's STRIKE TWO! & I don't want to see him directing a superhero/comicbook adaptation movie again. I can appreciate Daredevil with the highest tolerance, and would admit to liking it a little. But it still goes out the same that it was crap, & badly needed to fall on a new director.

There was no question of the choices for Nicholas Cage to be Johnny Blaze, Peter Fonda to be Mephistopheles, and Eva Mendes to be Roxanne Simpson. They are all superior performers, and very fitting for their roles at that. But the script never seemed to work well with the direction of the film. Many of the lines looked cheesy, mostly due to the editing which had bad timing and monotony of angles, so much so that Nicholas Cage's supposedly memorable lines end up looking like scenes from a bad B-movie. Same with Peter Fonda, who by the scarcity of film projects made him look like a struggling has-been in this movie. There were moments when Eva Mendes was comedically adorable. But her charm (that usually leaves me lovesick) could not save her from ending up looking like a cheap "face" in a sad project. At least Wes Bentley was spunky for the role. But his entire look for the film did not carry on a sense of overwhelmingly cool villain. His costume looked like he was spoofing each and every cliché from each and every badly-made superhero and vampire movie. His hair & make-up looked more metrosexual than demon, he could not intimidate me and I swear I could easily ward him off with smelly feet and a bad fashion sense.


The fight scenes were pathetic. Sure, the "minion" villains known as The Hidden were cool. But the fighting scenes with them did not excite me. In action movies, nothing's new these days when it comes to fight scenes. But one should at least make it either interesting or at least sensible for the audiences to get a sense of response. Many of the fight scenes in this movie makes you end up mumbling "Huh?", "What?!" or "Anu tu ya kuno?!" It's as if some characters were too dumb to stand and wait for a punch to hit them. Giving it credit, the film does make the effort to breakthrough with some kind of originality (with scenes like how he beat his enemy made out of the wind), the problem is, they don’t really convince me, as far as I’m concerned anyway.

CGI or Computer animation is this movie's main Ace card. The thing which it heavily relies to. But one should not really be strict in CGI judgment because in the long run, this technology will get old. It is actually how a film uses its technology to create a good movie. Ghost Rider may have fabulous CGI, but there isn’t too much innovative and impressive scenes for it to be a step ahead of the usual eye candy.

I cannot deny that there were moments when this movie made me laugh and cheer. But overall, it was a failure, that will stand aside other disappointing classics such as Blade Trinity, Daredevil, and a bit better than that awful Spawn movie adaptation. Oh well, I hope a sequel with a new director could redeem it.

Sunday, December 31, 2006

Super Noypi

Synopsis: Six normal childhood friends bound together by friendship find themselves faced with a shocking revelation – their parents are the legendary Super Noypi (WOW, This SOUNDS like SPY KIDS), the most powerful superheroes in the land! But now they are in danger, taken hostage by the wicked super-villain Diego (Monsour del Rosario… who dresses up like Magneto and supposedly floats in the air in a way where he looks like he’s being hung in a wire).
One by one, the six friends discover their super powers: moving objects using the mind, becoming invisible at will, having superhuman strength and speed, transforming into any shape imaginable, casting spells and controlling fire and ice (Obviously, this sequence will definitely look copy-pasted from “Fantastic Four”, and “Sky High”)

With the help of a strong and spirited stranger from the future named Lia (Jennylyn Mercado), who claims that the world as we know it will cease to exist if they don’t stop Diego now (And Why is that?), Lorenzo Valdez (Mark Herras… who dresses up in leathery trench coat just because he has powers even though it’s freakin hot here in the Philippines), Annys Valdez (Katrina Halili…who dresses up in brightly colored spandex for no valid reason, except to conform in the idiotic & narrow-minded director’s mind what ‘superhero’ is), Yñigo Raymundo (John Prats… who is a freaking OBVIOUS rip-off of Nighcrawler from “X-Men”), Euen Rapisora (Polo Ravales… whose acting is ever bland), Michie Rapisora (Sandara Park… who is typecast as an anime-like character ) and Tonton Valdez (Andrew Muhlach… who’s wearing an X-men uniform) stick together, taking a stand against evil in order to save the world and the people they love the most.

Personal Take: From the trailer, you will find that the film is flooded with copied clichés and copied shots. This film is devoid of any originality. How can you call it SuperNoypi when the heroes here all look like they’ve been copied from Hollywood movies. The film is directed by the ever selling-out Quark Henares, who up to now, has directed nothing quite original.

OTHER REVIEWS / COMMENTS

(from clickthecity.com)

SUPER IRRITATING !!!
A movie that i suggests you not to watch unless you're a kid. sorry to say that but that's the truth. It's better to say this for the producers and directors to know what will be the reaction of the people for them to realize that immitating movies are not good. They always tell us that "PIRACY IS A CRIME" but what can you call this film, copying other's concepts (X-MEN 3)?
x-x-x


I walked out the movie house about 1/3 of the film. Siguro dahil LFS na ako pumasok at inaantok na ako o, dahil baduy na baduy ako dito palabas na ito. Gusto ko sabunutan ulo ko para lang intindihin at patawarin paulit-ulit ang pelikula na ito.

Casting pa lang--talo na! Yung mga characters malabo introduction at mukha ngang gaya-gaya. Yung color grading ewan ko pero parang inconsistent. Sa VFX, yung umpisa lang ang OK--hanggang ok lang. Pag may effects yung shot, medyo blurred image--siguro dahil sa baba ng resolution. Screenplay--parang teleplay ang dating.

Sa mga actors nito, si John Prats lang ang magaling. Kahit gaya-gaya lang yung character niya (XMen's Nightcrawler) e, pasado na acting niya. Ewan ko kung paano natapos yung pelikula pero, magtatanong na lang ako sa mga batang nakatiis tapusin. Si Katrina, as usual, oozing ang looks pero dito e, maligamgam lang. Si Jenelyn ok na rin kahit mukhang wala rin siyang idea sa pelikula--parang tulala o kulang acting. The rest e, pang-dagdag na lang. Ah, oo nga pala, si Jao Mapa mukhang hinugot sa year 1980s dahil sa buhok at bigote niya. Lahat ng mga magulang ng characters ay ang babata para magka-anak ng ganoon katanda.

Pambata lang ang pelikula na ito at kahit bata mapapansin nila na mahina ang direktor na gumawa nito (Quark Henares). Nasayang lang ang pera ni mother Lily Monteverde tuloy.

Nung lumabas ako, hinanap ko poster nitong Super Noypi na 'to at--naku, kung talagang tinitigan ko lang yung poster e di ko na sana pinanood ito dahil kawawang kawawa posing ng mga actors. Sa mukha pa lang nila e, 'yun yung mukha na makukuha mo paglabas mo ng sinehan.

Hay nako, sa inyo na yung P100.00 pesos ko--pamasko ko sa Regal.
x-x-x

yup we realy suck at making movies like this..ginaya na di pa ginaya ng maigi..haay..kya konti lng nanonood ng pinoy movies dahil sa mga puro alang kwentang mga movies..gwapo at mgaganda lng mga artista ntin,pero alang substance..haaay..
- Anonymous
x-x-x

Walang single original thought yata yung movie na to... kawawa naman si TotoyBato, P100 pa yung binayad. Why they have the nerve to charge an extra P20 per ticket during Film Fetival season is really aggorant since they can't even make halfway decent movies.
- Anonymous
x-x-x

hehe sabe na nga ba baduy eh, sa trailer pa lang auko na panoorin eh big screen pa, nood ako SR&R 8 sa gateway mahaba pila pero mas mahaba sa super noypi ewan ko bakit.... sayang lang pera nila
- janosaurus
x-x-x